← Back to writing

SEP 1, 2022 · UPDATED JUL 20, 2026 · 12 MIN READ

Product Reviews

Top 12 Failed Products - Failure Examples and Best Management Lessons

As a Product Manager, we don't want our products to fail. Let us analyze some of the biggest failed products in technology to see why they failed.

This article covers the top tech failures across multiple categories.

We will go over social networks, phones, TVs, wearables, streaming, etc.

The point is to cover a wide variety of product categories to learn the best lessons from each example.

As a Product Manager, we don't want our products to fail. Let us analyze some of the biggest technology product failures to see why those products failed.

Top 12 Failed Products - List

Here is the list of the top 12 failed products of all time.

  1. Orkut

  2. Smart Glass

  3. Google+

  4. Amazon Fire Phone

  5. Segway

  6. Blackberry

  7. Luxury Smart Watch

  8. Foldable Smartphones

  9. 3D Maps

  10. 3D TV

  11. Nokia Smart Phone

  12. Quibi

Let us now cover each product failure in detail.

This will help us better understand why some very strong products from some very strong companies failed to make a dent.

Different management lessons will be discussed with each different example.

The product market fit is a key underlying concept across all these examples.

Product Failure Examples - Detailed

We will now cover each product failure example in detail.

Orkut

A social network ahead of its time.

Orkut was a popular social network, it was a great product and there was no real flaw as such. However, the target audience was just not ready for it.

Smartphones were not widely popular back then and the concept of "mobile apps" was primitive.

By the time the app industry on smartphones was starting to boom, Facebook had already made a killing.

Orkut - A social network ahead of its time.

Source

It is important for any social network to exert authority much beyond its size and scale. But, you still need to reach a decent user base.

Smart Glass - Immense Potential

Lack of a fashion sense is what most people say was the reason for the failure of the smart glasses.

The concept was great and it seemed to solve a real world issue. It promised you information without using your phone or your computer.

But, nobody wants something to look clumsy on their face.

In India, Reliance showed off the Jio Glass in 2020, an accessory built for virtual meetings with holographic projections. It never became a mainstream consumer product.

Apple finally launched its own take, the Vision Pro, in 2024 at $3,499. Even Apple's sense of fashion, usually reliable except for the Apple Watch Edition (more on that later), has not convinced people to wear a computer on their face all day.

The one version of the idea that is actually selling leads with fashion: Meta's Ray-Ban smart glasses look like regular glasses first and a gadget second. Which proves the original point. Nobody wants something clumsy on their face.

Smart Glass - Lack of a fashion sense.

Source

It is important to have a strategy or framework in place before launching a new product.

Google+

Google has a long list of failed products. Lack of focus defines this one. Google+ as a social network never even took off. At least Orkut had a great userbase. Orkut only failed because it was ahead of its time.

But, that was no excuse for Google+. The social network was too complex and only seemed to work as a sign-on service for Google.

Remember to follow the KISS principle.

There was no user connect and the product felt forced.

One could clearly tell that this was a half hearted attempt by Google to take on Facebook. Google quietly shut the consumer version down in 2019.

Facebook does one thing, but does it right. If you are developing a software, make sure you know why you are building it.

Google has a long list of failed products. Lack of focus defines this one. Google+ as a social network never even took off. At least Orkut had a great userbase. Orkut only failed because it was ahead of its time.

Source

Amazon Fire Phone

Lack of focus is true for this one as well.

The Kindle reader tablet took off because it managed to find a great market fit.

But, the phone entered a crowded market without any real USP.

There was no compelling reason to switch over from an iPhone to an Amazon phone.

Amazon fire phone was a failed product because it had no real USP.

Source

Amazon had already proved with the Kindle that it could build hardware people wanted. Managing wildly different products is just that hard, even for the best product leaders.

Segway - Classic Failed Product

This was supposed to change personal transport forever. People were supposed to stop walking. Travelling by a Segway was the future.

Well, guess what. People still walk.

Segway itself retired the original PT in July 2020, after selling only around 140,000 units in nearly two decades. By the end, only tourist and travel groups were using them.

Only tourist and travel groups use Segways now.

This is a great example of a tool that is absolutely not required.

Blackberry - Failed Products

These were the iPhones of their times. A Blackberry phone was a status symbol. Everyone who was anything owned a Blackberry.

What happened then? By all accounts, Blackberry became complacent.

Blackberry rested on its laurels and did not take its competition seriously.

These were the iPhones of their times. A Blackberry phone was a status symbol. Everyone who was anything owned a Blackberry.

Blackberry was seen as a product for "old executives" and it failed to capture the imagination of the millennials.

It lost the tag of an "aspirational product". The ending was final: Blackberry switched off the services behind its classic phones in January 2022, and the remaining devices stopped working as phones.

Agility was probably not the hallmark of Blackberry. It probably behaved more like a Waterfall company.

Learn the differences between Agile and Waterfall.

Luxury Smart Watch

Remember the $17,000 Apple Watch Edition? I don't blame you if you don't.

It was supposed to be a replacement for a luxury Swiss watch. Beyonce was seen wearing it.

But what happened? Did it replace the Rolex? Most definitely not.

Remember the $17000 Apple Watch Edition? I don't blame you if you don't.

Apple has not had very many failed products in the recent past.

Apple did not clearly understand its target audience. If the goal was to be a luxury watch, then the target audience was anyone who could afford a Rolex.

The next step was to understand the brand appeal and the product appeal of a Rolex. A Rolex does not sell because it has a voice assistant that can make phone calls for you. A Swiss watch is a timeless piece of luxury, a status symbol. This symbol was not born overnight. It took decades to become a symbol of luxury.

Even if this was a great product, it probably was not managed correctly. It probably also was not priced or marketed correctly.

Foldable Smartphones

Foldable screens have been doing the rounds for years now.

The original Samsung Galaxy Fold launched in 2019 as the phone that would redefine the category.

Instead, review units started breaking within days, and Samsung had to delay the launch by months to fix the design.

The original Samsung Galaxy Fold was delayed for months after review units started breaking within days.

The idea of a foldable screen itself sounds flimsy. People drop their phones all the time. I cannot imagine how careful one must be to take care of a foldable screen.

To Samsung's credit, it kept iterating, and foldables have since carved out a small niche. But the first Fold remains a textbook example of shipping before the product was ready.

3D Maps - Recent Failed Product

I don't think anybody really uses the 3D features in any map app. It just feels too clumsy and unnecessary to view the surroundings in 3D.

Also, not sure how many are aware of this, but the 3D feature rarely works in developing countries.

The 3D feature works great in well mapped cities like New York, but not in New Delhi.

There is no clear USP over regular 2D maps. It simply does not have the user scale and data reach to match that of 2D maps.

There is no clear USP over Google Maps. It simply does not have the user scale and data reach to match that of Google.

The feature also looks buggy. The developers probably didn't use Jira to track their defects!

As a Product Manager, we need to have a clear USP in mind. We need to make sure that through out our Scrum or Kanban processes, our focus on the USP is not lost.

3D TV - Failed Products Category

3D TVs were a rage when they were first launched. I bought one too! But the entire category is now a failed product category. By 2017, even the last holdouts, LG and Sony, had stopped making them.

I was even given "complimentary" 3D glasses when I bought my 3D TV. It was finally time to test the TV out. I was super excited and couldn't wait to turn my regular movies into 3D movies.

Nothing happened.

The 3D experience was minimal, at best. More often than not, the 3D experience was extremely under-whelming.

3D TVs were a rage when they were first launched. I bought one too! But the entire category is now considered a failed product.

There were a few failure reasons at play here.

First, the product proposition was not clear.

It was not immediately clear whether any movie on TV can be converted to 3D or only a certain type of movie can be a 3D movie.

For the longest time, I was under the impression that anything could be magically turned into 3D.

But, of course, that was not the case.

Second, the actual user experience at home was very different from the user experience in a movie theatre.

In a cinema hall, people don't mind sitting still with 3D glasses on.

At home, that simply does not happen.

People are distracted by a plethora of things and they constantly have to take off their 3D glasses.

Failed products are more often than not a result of failed communication.

Nokia Smart Phone

I was actually excited by the launch of the Nokia smart phone, coupled with the Microsoft partnership.

The Microsoft UI looked great and the Nokia hardware partnership helped.

But, the phone did not do well.

The Microsoft UI looked great and the Nokia hardware partnership helped.

One reason for the failure was the lack of third party developer interest in creating another version of their apps, after already building them for the Android and the Apple markets.

This was a lost opportunity for Nokia.

Quibi - The $1.75 Billion Failure

Quibi earns its place on this list because it failed with every possible advantage.

It raised $1.75 billion before launch. It was run by Jeffrey Katzenberg and Meg Whitman. It launched in April 2020 with Hollywood content made specifically for phones, in ten-minute episodes called "quick bites".

Six months later, it announced it was shutting down. The app had around 500,000 paying subscribers against a first-year projection of over 7 million. The content library was sold off to Roku for less than $100 million.

The failure reasons stack on top of each other. Quibi charged for short mobile video while TikTok and YouTube gave it away for free. It launched into lockdowns, when nobody was commuting. And at launch you could not watch it on a TV or share screenshots of what you were watching.

No amount of funding or star power can substitute for a working product feedback loop. The signal was there within weeks. Quibi could not act on it in time.

The Same Failure Patterns, Now in AI Projects

The newest entries in this category are not phones or TVs. They are the AI pilots quietly dying inside companies right now.

The failure patterns are the same ones in this list. An AI project with no clear USP is the Fire Phone all over again. One that chases the technology instead of the user? That's 3D TV. And Quibi is what happens when a big budget gets mistaken for product market fit.

I wrote a separate breakdown of why AI projects fail and how to spot the warning signs early. If your company is starting an AI initiative, it's much cheaper to learn from someone else's failed product than from your own.

Failed Products Conclusion

In the end, success of a product rests on the shoulders of a Product Manager. Equally, if not more important, is the fact that failure also rests on the shoulders of a Product Manager.

That is why it is critical to understand the Product Life Cycle.

At the same time, it is important for a Product Manager to be product agnostic.

A lot of courses available online focus on what is product management. But very few highlight product failures as an example of what can go wrong.

RELATED READING

FREQUENTLY ASKED

What's the most common reason products fail?
No real market need. The team built something well-engineered for a problem customers didn't have, or had but weren't willing to pay to solve. This is the failure mode behind a majority of well-known product failures. The fix is upstream: validate demand before building, not after.
Is product failure always avoidable?
No. Some failures come from market timing nobody could have predicted, or from competitive moves that change the market mid-build. The avoidable failures are the ones with predictable patterns: vague strategy, weak feedback loops, mis-priced features, premature scaling. Those are the ones to study.
What's the most useful lesson from failed products?
Most product failures rhyme. The patterns repeat: building before validating, scaling before fit, ignoring early signal, and committing to a vision past the point where evidence calls for a pivot. Studying past failures helps not because you'll see your exact situation, but because you'll recognize the shape when it shows up in your own roadmap.
← Back to writing